1990 (10) TMI 15 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Computation of capital gains on the sale of a racehorse for the assessment year 1967-68.
2. Determining whether maintenance expenses on the mother-horse and the offspring constitute the cost of improvement of the asset under section 48(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. Deciding whether payments made to the stud-farm should be deducted as the cost of acquisition in computing capital gains.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The High Court considered the computation of capital gains on the sale of a racehorse for the assessment year 1967-68. The Tribunal initially computed the capital gains at Rs. 5,000, but upon further appeal by the Revenue, it was argued that additional expenses incurred by the assessee should be considered. The Court ultimately determined the assessable capital gains at Rs. 10,000, taking into account the total deduction of Rs. 25,000 along with the cost of acquisition of the mare at Rs. 15,000.

Issue 2:
Regarding the second issue, the Court analyzed whether maintenance expenses on the mother-horse and the offspring could constitute the cost of improvement of the asset under section 48(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court observed that the expenses incurred on training the animals contributed to the improvement of the capital asset. It was held that the maintenance expenses on the mare and the offspring could be considered as the cost of improvement within the meaning of the latter part of section 48(ii) of the Act.

Issue 3:
The third issue involved determining whether payments made to the stud-farm should be deducted as the cost of acquisition in computing capital gains. The Court acknowledged that the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the maintenance of the mare at the stud-farm, leading to the birth of the colt and the filly, could be regarded as the cost of acquisition of the offspring. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's decision that the amount spent on maintenance could be considered as the cost of acquisition of the colt and the filly.

In conclusion, the Court answered all three questions in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision on the computation of capital gains and the treatment of maintenance expenses as part of the cost of improvement of the asset. The Court awarded costs to the assessee for the reference.