1991 (4) TMI 51 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Inclusion of retirement gratuity reserve in the computation of capital for surtax assessment.
2. Inclusion of dividend reserve in the computation of capital for surtax assessment.
3. Treatment of taxation reserve in excess of liability as a reserve for surtax assessment.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Retirement Gratuity Reserve
The court addressed whether the retirement gratuity reserve of Rs. 16,17,966 should be included in the computation of capital for surtax assessment. Counsel agreed that the treatment of this reserve should be in line with the Supreme Court decision in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 132 ITR 559. The court held that only the excess amount of the reserve over the liability of the assessee should be considered as a reserve. Therefore, the retirement gratuity reserve was not entirely treated as a reserve, but only the surplus amount above the liability.

Issue 2: Dividend Reserve
The court deliberated on whether the dividend reserve of Rs. 10,00,000 should be included in the computation of capital for surtax assessment. The Revenue argued that this question was resolved in their favor by the Supreme Court decision, while the assessee's counsel contended otherwise, citing CIT v. Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd. [1990] 186 ITR 138. The court analyzed the facts and clarified that the dividend reserve should only include the excess amount over the dividend proposed and actually declared. As the actual dividend declared was Rs. 9,37,500, the excess amount of the reserve above this figure was to be treated as a reserve for surtax assessment.

Issue 3: Taxation Reserve
Regarding the taxation reserve in excess of the liability, the court decided that it should be treated as a reserve for the surtax assessment. The court emphasized that the actual tax liability should be considered in determining the taxation reserve to be included in the computation of capital. The treatment of this reserve was aligned with the principles established in previous judgments and the relevant provisions of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.

In conclusion, the court provided clarity on the treatment of reserves in the computation of capital for surtax assessment, ensuring consistency with established legal precedents and statutory provisions.