Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (1) TMI 583 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Waiver of pre-deposit of demands adjudged under Rule 6(3)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, disallowance of CENVAT Credit on ineligible capital goods, demand of interest, penalty under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis:
The case involved the applicants seeking waiver of pre-deposit of various demands. The demands included an amount equal to 10%/5% of the value of exempted products, disallowance of CENVAT Credit on ineligible capital goods, demand of interest, and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The applicants were engaged in manufacturing 'sponge iron' and used various inputs in the manufacturing process. They availed CENVAT Credit on duty/service tax paid on lubricants, chemicals, and taxable services. A show cause notice was issued for disallowance of CENVAT Credit on 'Waste Heat Recovery Boiler' and payment of an amount equal to the value of exempted goods, i.e., steam. The demands were confirmed, leading the applicants to seek waiver of pre-deposit.

The applicants argued that the 'Waste Heat Recovery Boiler' was essential for pollution control and entitled them to CENVAT Credit. They contended that the steam generated during the manufacturing process of 'sponge iron' was not liable to excise duty as no credit was taken on inputs for steam generation. They cited a precedent to support their case. The Revenue opposed, stating that the steam was sold by the applicants and thus, the denial of CENVAT Credit was justified.

The Tribunal considered the submissions and found the applicants entitled to CENVAT Credit on the 'Waste Heat Recovery Boiler' as a pollution control device. Regarding the steam generation issue, the Tribunal referred to a previous case and agreed that no part of the inputs went into the manufacture of steam. Following the precedent decision, the Tribunal concluded that the applicants had a case for waiver of pre-deposit of the demands.

Consequently, the Tribunal granted 100% waiver of pre-deposit of the demands, interest, and penalty, staying the recovery during the appeal's pendency. The operative part of the order was pronounced on a specific date.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the issues involved, the arguments presented by both parties, the Tribunal's considerations, and the final decision granting waiver of pre-deposit to the applicants.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates