Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (3) TMI 164 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty.
2. Denial of benefit of Notification no. 10/2006-CE.
3. Classification of pressure booster system under sub-heading 84137010.
4. Dispute over whether the product qualifies as power driven pumps.
5. Revenue's contention regarding the input for manufacturing the pressure boosting system.
6. Interpretation of the notification and Central Excise Tariff classification.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty amounting to Rs.68,44,267/-, where the demand was confirmed by denying the benefit of Notification no. 10/2006-CE. The dispute revolved around the classification of a pressure booster system under sub-heading 84137010 of the Central Excise Tariff, with the key issue being whether the said system qualified as power driven pumps primarily designed for handling water. The applicants argued that the product in question, comprising centrifugal pumps and other components, fell within the ambit of the notification, as they were used for lifting water. The Revenue contended that the system was more than just power driven pumps and hence, the benefit was rightly denied.

Upon examining the notification and Tariff classification, the Tribunal observed that the applicants classified the product under Heading 84137010, which covered power driven pumps primarily designed for handling water. Since the Revenue did not dispute this classification, the Tribunal found a strong case for waiver of pre-deposit dues. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the stay petition, waiving the pre-deposit of dues and staying the recovery pending the appeal hearing.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision hinged on the interpretation of the notification and the Central Excise Tariff classification, ultimately favoring the applicant's contention that the pressure booster system qualified as power driven pumps primarily designed for handling water, warranting the waiver of pre-deposit of dues and a stay on recovery.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates