Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1991 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (6) TMI 56 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Validity of deed of assignment executed by the assessee.
2. Taxability of only half of the income from the residuary property in the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72.

Analysis:
The High Court of Gujarat considered the validity of a deed of assignment executed by the assessee and the taxability of half of the income from the residuary property for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72. The assessee, a son of Pestanji Contractor, inherited rights under a will that entitled him to the entire income from the residuary property after the death of his mother, Jerbai. The assessee executed a deed of assignment in 1951, transferring half of the income to his children. The Commissioner of Income-tax later held that the entire income should be taxed in the hands of the assessee, leading to a dispute. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal both concluded that the assessee was liable to be assessed only in respect of half of the income from the residuary property.

In analyzing the case, the Court referred to the relevant clause of the will, which clearly outlined the distribution of income from the residuary property. The Court noted that the assessee had a legal right to transfer or assign his interest in the income from the residuary property, as there were no legal provisions or restrictions preventing such assignments. Drawing parallels to a Supreme Court case involving a trust deed, the Court affirmed that the deed of assignment executed by the assessee was valid and legal. Therefore, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the assessee was liable to be assessed only for half of the income from the residuary property.

The Court's decision was based on the assessee's legal right to assign half of the income from the residuary property to his children, as outlined in the will. As a result, the Court answered both questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference was disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates