9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 80VV of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction of expenses incurred in connection with certain proceedings under the Act. Analysis: The judgment pertains to a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1977-78. The primary issue was whether professional charges of Rs. 5,000 paid for obtaining advice for the preparation of income-tax return fall within the scope of section 80VV of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed a deduction for various expenses, including professional charges, travelling expenses, and fees for income-tax appeals. The Income-tax Officer disallowed these expenses as deductions. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed Rs. 5,000 under section 80VV, prompting the assessee to appeal to the Tribunal, arguing that all expenses were allowable and the Commissioner's restriction to Rs. 5,000 was unjustified. The Tribunal held that the deduction of Rs. 5,000 incurred for advice from consultants was permissible as it was not for appearing before the authorities mentioned in section 80VV. Similarly, travelling expenses of consultants were also allowed as they were not paid for appearing before the specified authorities. However, the fees of Rs. 6,000 for income-tax appeals were considered exceeding the permissible limit, resulting in a restricted disallowance of Rs. 1,000. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's findings, emphasizing that expenses for obtaining advice and preparation of returns did not fall within the purview of section 80VV, which specifically pertains to proceedings before income-tax authorities, the Appellate Tribunal, or courts related to determining liabilities under the Act. The Court noted that the facts found by the Tribunal were undisputed, and only the fees incurred for the income-tax lawyer in connection with appearances before appellate authorities or the Tribunal were subject to restriction. The judgment highlighted that the expenses in question were not incurred in connection with appearances before the specified authorities for determining liabilities under the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision to restrict the disallowance to Rs. 1,000 and allow Rs. 5,000 under section 80VV was considered appropriate based on the facts of the case. Consequently, the Court answered the reference question in the negative and in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision. In conclusion, the judgment provides a detailed analysis of the interpretation and application of section 80VV of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deduction of expenses incurred in connection with specific proceedings under the Act. It underscores the importance of expenses being directly related to appearances before income-tax authorities, the Appellate Tribunal, or courts for determining liabilities under the Act to qualify for deductions under the specified section.
|
