9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issue involved in this case is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that it was premature for the assessee to put forward its claim of business loss in the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1975-76. Judgment Details: The assessee, a partnership firm, was involved in a business in cloth on commission basis during the assessment year 1975-76. The firm faced a situation where one of its employees misutilized a cheque, leading to a loss of Rs. 41,000. The employee and the recipient of the misutilized cheque were arrested, but the criminal proceedings were ongoing. The assessee claimed this loss during the assessment year in question. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the claim, stating that since the fate of the criminal proceedings was uncertain, it could not be confirmed that a loss had occurred. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal upheld this decision, deeming the claim premature due to conflicting versions of events and the lack of resolution in the courts. The assessee contended that the Tribunal's finding was unsustainable and that it should have made a decision on the claim instead of deeming it premature. The assessee also referred to a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes stating that losses due to embezzlement by employees should be treated as incidental to business and allowed as a deduction in the year of discovery. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in considering the claim premature and should have examined the matter to make a decision. The Tribunal was directed to reconsider the issue and make a final determination. Therefore, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Tribunal should not have deemed the claim premature and should have made a decision on the plea put forward by the assessee. The Tribunal was instructed to reevaluate the issue and provide a final decision.
|
