1988 (2) TMI 15 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Deductibility of Rs. 50,000 paid to Pioneer Construction Company for the assessment year 1969-70.
2. Validity of the cancellation of the Commissioner of Income-tax's order u/s 263 for the assessment year 1967-68.
3. Deductibility of Rs. 50,000 paid to Pioneer Construction Company for the assessment year 1968-69.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deductibility of Rs. 50,000 for the assessment year 1969-70

The court examined whether the payment of Rs. 50,000 made by the assessee to Pioneer Construction Company, Vijayawada, u/s the "Dissolution deed" dated January 1, 1966, was allowable as a deduction in computing the income for the assessment year 1969-70. The Tribunal had held that this payment was revenue in nature, substituting a less onerous contract for a more burdensome one. The Tribunal's decision was based on the premise that the payment was made in the course of carrying on the assessee's business and was incidental to it. The court upheld this view, stating that the payment was made on grounds of commercial expediency and did not result in any enduring benefit or acquisition of a capital asset.

Issue 2: Validity of the cancellation of the Commissioner of Income-tax's order u/s 263 for the assessment year 1967-68

The Tribunal had cancelled the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax u/s 263, which had set aside the deduction allowed by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment year 1967-68. The court noted that the answer to this issue depended on the view taken on the first issue. Since the payment was considered revenue in nature for the assessment year 1969-70, the Tribunal's cancellation of the Commissioner's order for the assessment year 1967-68 was also upheld.

Issue 3: Deductibility of Rs. 50,000 for the assessment year 1968-69

Similar to the first issue, the court examined whether the payment of Rs. 50,000 made by the assessee to Pioneer Construction Company, Vijayawada, was allowable as a deduction for the assessment year 1968-69. The Tribunal had allowed this deduction, and the court upheld this decision as well, following the same reasoning applied to the first issue.

Conclusion:

The court answered all three questions in the affirmative and against the Revenue. The payment of Rs. 50,000 was deemed to be revenue in nature and allowable as a deduction for the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69, and 1969-70. The Revenue was directed to pay costs amounting to Rs. 1,000.