9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 2(14)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding whether silver vessels qualify as 'personal effects'. Detailed Analysis: The case involved a question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the classification of silver vessels as 'personal effects' under section 2(14)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee had sold silverware items, claiming them to be personal effects excluded from the definition of "capital asset." The Income-tax Officer treated the difference in value as long-term capital gains, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). However, the Tribunal accepted the contention that the articles were personal effects, emphasizing their potential daily use despite their considerable value. The Tribunal found that the silver articles were intended for daily use, even though they were not used every day due to their value. The Tribunal noted that the items, including dinner plates, glasses, and jugs, were capable of being used on various occasions like birthdays and festivals. The Tribunal's decision was based on the understanding that the articles were normally intended for personal or household use and were in fact used on different occasions throughout the year. The Revenue challenged the Tribunal's decision, arguing that the Tribunal misdirected itself on the legal principle of personal effects as laid down by the Supreme Court. The Revenue contended that it was unusual for a person to keep numerous silver items for personal or household use, as these items are rarely used for such purposes. However, the Tribunal's acceptance of the assessee's claim was based on the representative's enumeration of occasions when the articles were used, implying that they were normally intended for personal or household use and were in fact utilized as such on various occasions. The Court acknowledged the absence of a specific challenge to the Tribunal's findings and concluded that, based on the available evidence and the Tribunal's decision, the silver vessels qualified as personal effects. The Court directed the parties to bear their respective costs and ordered the judgment to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.
|
