Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2014 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (7) TMI 60 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Appeal against confiscation of imported goods with an option to pay redemption fine and imposition of penalty under Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09.

Analysis:
The appellant imported old and used Buoyancy Tanks along with other equipment for laying off-shore pipelines without a proper license. The adjudicating authority confiscated the goods, imposed a redemption fine, and penalty, which was confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant contended that the goods were capital goods used for rendering services and, as per para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09, old and used capital goods can be freely imported without a specific license. The appellant argued that no violation occurred. The respondent argued that the goods were not capital goods and required a specific license for importation.

The Tribunal considered the submissions and found that the imported goods, including Buoyancy Tanks, wire ropes, shackles chain blocks, and hydraulic pumps, were used for laying off-shore pipelines, indicating they were capital goods imported for service. According to para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09, old and used goods can be freely imported without a specific license. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the appellant did not need a license for importing these goods, leading to no grounds for confiscation, redemption fine, or penalty. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

The adjudicating authority was directed to implement the Tribunal's order within 30 days of communication.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates