Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2014 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (8) TMI 193 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
- Pre-deposit of service tax and penalty confirmed against the appellant for the period 2006-07 to 2009-10.
- Tax liability on the sale of confectionary items like chips, cakes, biscuits.
- Abatement under Notification No. 1/2006 for outdoor catering services on trains.

Analysis:
1. The appellant, a caterer providing food items to train passengers, sought to dispense with the pre-deposit condition of service tax and penalty amounting to Rs. 1,46,26,474/- confirmed for the period 2006-07 to 2009-10. The appellant recovered the cost of services from M/s. IRCTC and discharged service tax liability after claiming abatement as per Notification No. 1/2006. Additionally, the appellant sold confectionary items to passengers against cash, leading to a dispute with Revenue regarding the assessable value of services provided.

2. The Revenue contended that the sale of confectionary items should be added to the assessable value of services under the category of 'outdoor caterers,' resulting in a Show Cause Notice proposing demand confirmation based on the differential value reflected in the appellant's returns and balance sheet. The dispute centered on the tax amount paid by the appellant, which the Revenue claimed was lower than the actual liability, leading to the demand of Rs. 1,46,26,474/-.

3. The appellant argued that the differential amount primarily arose from the tax demanded on the sale of items like potato chips, biscuits, cakes, etc., on trains where no catering was involved, and they paid VAT on such sales. The Revenue argued that the abatement could be availed only after including the value of all meal items in the services, a principle allegedly not followed by the appellant, justifying the confirmed demand.

4. Upon considering both arguments, the Tribunal acknowledged that the sale of packaged items like biscuits, cakes, potato chips at MRP prices on trains constituted a distinct activity from serving meals. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's contention that such sales were not subject to service tax, especially after allowing the 50% abatement. The Revenue failed to rebut the appellant's claim that the difference in financial statements and the value of services was due to these sales. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the admitted appeal and stayed the collection of dues pending the appeal process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates