Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2014 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (9) TMI 716 - HC - Central Excise


Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to CENVAT Credit for furnace oil used in generating steam/electricity for use in another unit within the same compound.
2. Interpretation of the definition of "input" and "factory" under the CENVAT Credit Rules and Central Excise Act.
3. Obligation to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted goods.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Entitlement to CENVAT Credit for furnace oil used in generating steam/electricity for use in another unit within the same compound:

The Revenue challenged the Tribunal's order confirming the proportionate CENVAT Credit availed by the assessee for furnace oil used in generating steam/electricity supplied to an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) within the same compound. The Revenue argued that the assessee did not reverse the proportionate CENVAT Credit as required by Rule 57 AD (2) of Central Excise Rules 1944 and Rules 6(2) & (3) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2001/2002/2004. The Tribunal, relying on precedents, treated the units within the same compound as a single factory, thus allowing the CENVAT Credit.

2. Interpretation of the definition of "input" and "factory" under the CENVAT Credit Rules and Central Excise Act:

The court examined the definitions of "input" and "factory" under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the Central Excise Act. "Input" includes goods used for generating electricity or steam within the factory of production. The term "factory" is defined inclusively to mean any premises where excisable goods are manufactured. The court noted that the definition of "factory" could include more than one premises, implying that multiple units within the same compound could be considered a single factory.

3. Obligation to maintain separate accounts for inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted goods:

Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, mandates that CENVAT Credit shall not be allowed on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods unless separate accounts are maintained. The court observed that the assessee is entitled to CENVAT Credit on inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable goods within the factory. Since the factory can include multiple units within the same premises, the steam generated and used in both units qualifies for CENVAT Credit.

Conclusion:

The court concluded that the assessee's factory, comprising two units within the same premises, qualifies as a single factory under the Central Excise Act. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to CENVAT Credit for the entire volume of steam used in manufacturing excisable goods in both units. The appellate authorities' orders granting relief to the assessee were upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates