Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2015 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (2) TMI 52 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Assessment under Puducherry General Sales Tax Act for the year 2003-04 - Whether supply, laying, and spreading of ready mix concrete constitutes an outright sale of ready mix?

Analysis:
The petitioner, a manufacturer of ready mix cement concrete, claimed exemption under the works contract scheme for the assessment year in question. The assessing officer, however, revised the assessment, stating that the supply and pumping of ready mix concrete did not fall under works contract, leading to the entire turnover being taxed at three percent. The petitioner's objection was based on the process of supplying and laying the concrete mixture, supported by agreements between the dealer and purchaser detailing the transportation and laying process. The assessing officer rejected the contention due to the absence of separate invoicing for material and labor charges. The appeal to the Assistant Commissioner and subsequent appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal were also dismissed.

The Tribunal held that the petitioner engaged in the sale of cement concrete mixture, evident from the separate invoicing for material, labor, and transport charges. The agreement terms indicated the responsibility of the petitioner in providing the concrete, measuring the area, and laying it with technical assistance. The Tribunal concluded that the main activity was the supply of concrete, with laying being incidental, citing relevant court decisions. Dissatisfied, the petitioner filed a revision.

The High Court found the Tribunal's interpretation flawed, as the petitioner's obligations extended beyond mere supply to include laying the concrete with quality assurance and compensation for future leakages. Despite the absence of the term "works contract" in the agreement, the Court held that the nature of the transaction qualified as a works contract. Referring to the government order of exemption, the Court allowed the revision, setting aside the Tribunal's decision and recognizing the transaction as a composite works contract involving both material and labor.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates