9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (2) TMI 936 - AT - Income TaxDeduction claimed u/s 80-IA - profits derived from the business of windmill - as per the Revenue, the losses incurred by the assessee for A.Y. 2002-03 and 2003-04 from the activity of windmill have to be reduced from the current year s profits of the windmill activity in order to compute the amount eligible for deduction u/s 80-IA - Held that - Assessee is eligible for claim of deduction u/s 80-IA of the Act for the year under consideration in a manner whereby the initial assessment year referred to in section 80-IA(5) of the Act is to be taken as the A.Y. 2004-05 and not the A.Y. 2002-03 as canvassed by the Revenue. Resultantly, we therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to recompute and allow the deduction to the assessee u/s 80-IA of the Act as above. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Deduction claimed under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Interpretation of "initial assessment year" under section 80-IA(5) of the Act. 3. Set-off of past losses against current year's profits for computing deduction under section 80-IA. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Deduction claimed under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The appellant, an individual engaged in power generation, claimed a deduction of Rs. 25,62,413/- under section 80-IA of the Act for the profits derived from the windmill business. The windmill was set up in the assessment year (A.Y.) 2002-03, and the appellant exercised the option for deduction starting from A.Y. 2004-05. The main contention was whether the losses incurred in A.Y. 2002-03 and 2003-04 should be set off against the profits of the current year (A.Y. 2006-07) for computing the deduction under section 80-IA. 2. Interpretation of "initial assessment year" under section 80-IA(5) of the Act: The core issue revolved around the interpretation of "initial assessment year" as per section 80-IA(5). The appellant argued that the "initial assessment year" should be A.Y. 2004-05, the year in which the option for deduction was exercised. Conversely, the Revenue contended that the "initial assessment year" should be A.Y. 2002-03, the year the windmill commenced operations. 3. Set-off of past losses against current year's profits for computing deduction under section 80-IA: The Revenue's stance was that losses from A.Y. 2002-03 and 2003-04 should be set off against the profits of A.Y. 2006-07, even though these losses were already absorbed against other incomes in the past years. The appellant argued that only the losses from A.Y. 2004-05 onwards should be considered for set-off, as the "initial assessment year" should be A.Y. 2004-05 when the option for deduction was exercised. Judgment Analysis: The Tribunal referred to the case of Serum International Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT Range 6, Pune, where a similar issue was decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal followed the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT, which held that the "initial assessment year" for section 80-IA should be the year the option for deduction is exercised, not the year the business commenced operations. Therefore, only the losses from the "initial assessment year" onwards should be set off against the profits of the eligible business. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's reliance on the Special Bench decision in the case of Goldmine Shares and Finance (P) Ltd., stating that the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. prevails. The Tribunal emphasized that the decision of a non-jurisdictional High Court is binding unless there is a contrary decision from another competent High Court. Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the "initial assessment year" for the appellant should be A.Y. 2004-05, and only the losses from that year onwards should be considered for set-off. Consequently, the appellant's claim for deduction under section 80-IA for A.Y. 2006-07 and A.Y. 2007-08 was allowed without setting off the losses from A.Y. 2002-03 and 2003-04. The orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) were set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute and allow the deduction as per the Tribunal's findings. Decision: The appeals of the assessee for both assessment years were allowed, and the decision was pronounced in the open court on 12th December 2012.
|
