Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (3) TMI 205 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the Appeal.
2. Stay petition for waiver of predeposit of CENVAT Credit.

Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The Applicant filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking condonation of a three-day delay in filing the Appeal. The Advocate for the Applicant explained that the delay was due to the Appeal not being filed on time because of the Advocate's sickness. A Medical Certificate was presented as evidence to support the reason for the delay. The Advocate for the Revenue did not object to the facts presented. Considering the reasons provided in the Miscellaneous Application and supported by the Medical Certificate, the delay was condoned, and the Application was allowed.

Stay Petition for Waiver of Predeposit of CENVAT Credit:
The Applicant filed a Stay Petition seeking waiver of predeposit of CENVAT Credit amounting to Rs. 1.11 lakh. The demand notice was issued for the recovery of the CENVAT Credit, alleging irregular availment of the Credit on invoices from first/second stage dealers who were not registered. However, the Adjudicating Authority allowed the CENVAT Credit and dropped the proceedings. On appeal by the Revenue, the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the Adjudication Order. The Applicant argued that the invoices in question were issued by registered first/second stage dealers, making the CENVAT Credit admissible. The Advocate for the Revenue supported the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). Upon reviewing the invoices enclosed with the Appeal Memorandum, it was found that the basic requirements for availing the CENVAT Credit were met. No discrepancies were observed at that stage. Consequently, the Applicant established a prima facie case for the total waiver of the adjudged dues. As a result, predeposit of the dues adjudged was waived, and the recovery was stayed during the pendency of the Appeal. The Stay Petition was allowed, and the recovery of the dues was stayed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates