9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to exemption u/s 11 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1963-64 to 1968-69 and 1969-70 to 1972-73. 2. Taxability of any portion of the income u/s 28(iii) of the Income-tax Act for the above assessment years. Summary: Issue 1: Exemption u/s 11 of the Income-tax Act The assessee, South Indian Photographic Company and Allied Trades Association, claimed exemption u/s 11 on the grounds that it is a non-profit organization devoted to the advancement of an object of general public utility. The Income-tax Officer denied this claim, but the Tribunal later held that the company is entitled to exemption u/s 11 to the extent the income was applied for charitable purposes in India. The Tribunal directed the Income-tax Officer to ascertain the extent of income applied to charitable purposes for each assessment year and provide the necessary relief. The High Court examined whether the objects of the company are for the advancement of general public utility not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit. The court noted that the company's memorandum of association includes objects such as promoting commerce, art, science, and protecting the interests of photographic and allied traders. The court found that the company's income and property are solely applied for the promotion of its objects and not for profit distribution among its members. Citing precedents like *In re The Trustees of the Tribune*, *Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust*, and *CIT v. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry*, the court concluded that the company's activities align with the definition of "charitable purpose" u/s 2(15). Therefore, the company is entitled to exemption u/s 11. Issue 2: Taxability u/s 28(iii) of the Income-tax Act The Tribunal held that the provisions of section 28(iii) are not attracted in this case. The High Court agreed, noting that the company is a non-profit body with objects of general public utility and does not carry on any activity for profit. The court referenced the decision in *CIT v. South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce*, which held that income derived from services rendered to members is not liable to be taxed u/s 28(iii). Conclusion: The High Court answered the first question in the affirmative, confirming the company's entitlement to exemption u/s 11, and the second question in the negative, ruling that no portion of the income is liable to be taxed u/s 28(iii). The Revenue was directed to pay the costs of the assessee-company.
|
