9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (4) TMI 837 - HC - Income TaxValidity of the assessment proceedings under Section 158 BC - Held that - As from the appraisal report in the case of Parmar Group prepared by ADIT (INV), Valsad, which was submitted through additional DIT(INV), Surat, and on perusal it appears that it was a case of survey and there was no search of the premises of the assessee under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act. Whatever the material was collected, was / were during the course of survey at the site office of the Parmar Builders and Developers, Emperor Building, Vapi. Under the circumstances, the material used for framing assessment under Section 158 BC was collected during the survey and not search proceedings under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act. In view of the above, it cannot be said that the learned Tribunal has committed any error in holding the assessment proceedings under Section 158 BC of the Act has invalid. The learned Tribunal has rightly quashed and set aside the assessment under Section 158 BC of the Act on the ground that material collector during the survey was used while framing the assessment under Section 158 BC of the Act. No substantial question of law arise in the present appeals. On the contrary, we affirm the view taken by the learned Tribunal. - Decided against revenue.
Issues:
Validity of assessment proceedings under Section 158 BC of the Income Tax Act based on material collected during a survey action. Analysis: Issue 1: Validity of Assessment Proceedings under Section 158 BC: The appeals arose from a common judgment by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which set aside the assessments for block assessment periods due to the use of material collected during a survey for making additions. The Revenue challenged this decision, raising substantial questions of law regarding the validity of the assessment. The Tribunal allowed the appeals by quashing the assessments made under Section 158 BC of the Act. Issue 2: Material Used for Assessment: The assessee, a partnership firm in civil construction, faced assessment proceedings after a search/survey at their office premises. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions to the undisclosed income based on the seized material. The CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal, reducing the additions made by the AO. However, the assessee contended that the material used for additions was collected during the survey and not a search under Section 132 of the Act, challenging the validity of the assessment proceedings under Section 158 BC. Issue 3: Judicial Review and Decision: The High Court reviewed the Tribunal's judgment and the orders passed by the AO and CIT(A). After examining the appraisal report, it was confirmed that the material used for the assessment under Section 158 BC was gathered during a survey and not a search under Section 132. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to set aside the assessments, concluding that no error was made in holding the assessment proceedings invalid. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's view. In conclusion, the High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal to quash the assessments under Section 158 BC of the Income Tax Act, as the material used for additions was collected during a survey and not a search. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal's ruling.
|
