9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (8) TMI 850 - HC - Income TaxCessation of liability - whether the conversion of liabilities of the Assessee into equity share capital at a premium resulted in any benefit to the Assessee within the meaning of Section 28 (iv) or Section 41(1) (a) of the Act? - Held that - The finding returned concurrently by both the CIT (A) and the ITAT that the conversion of loans into capital did not result in any benefit to the Assessee and that the nature of the liability essentially remained the same. The Court concurs with the said view. Indeed there was no cessation of liability on account of the allotment of shares in favour of the creditors. It has rightly been held by the ITAT that the decision in CIT v. T.V. Sundram Iyengar & Sons 1996 (9) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court has no applicability to the facts of the present case. - Decided against revenue.
Issues: Delay in re-filing appeal, Benefit of conversion of liabilities into equity share capital, Applicability of Section 28(iv) and Section 41(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Cessation of liability, Set off of brought forward loss by share premium, Substantial question of law
The High Court judgment pertains to an appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the Assessment Year 2005-06. The appeal faced a delay of 320 days in re-filing after defects removal, attributed to a change of counsel, which the Court deemed unsatisfactory. Despite the delay, the Court proceeded to examine the appeal on its merits. The central issue revolved around whether converting liabilities into equity share capital at a premium provided any benefit to the Assessee under Section 28(iv) or Section 41(1)(a) of the Act. Both the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the ITAT concluded that the conversion did not confer any benefit as the nature of the liability remained unchanged. The Court agreed with this assessment, emphasizing that there was no cessation of liability due to the allotment of shares to creditors. The Court also noted that the precedent cited by the Appellant was inapplicable to the case at hand. The Appellant's counsel highlighted the Assessing Officer's observation regarding the set off of brought forward loss by share premium in the Assessee's profit and loss account. However, the Revenue did not raise this issue before the ITAT, nor was it presented in the current appeal. Consequently, the Court found no grounds to consider this aspect, as it was not appropriately raised during the proceedings. Ultimately, the Court determined that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order that warranted further examination. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT's decision on the matter. In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues of delay in re-filing the appeal, the lack of benefit from converting liabilities into equity share capital, the absence of a cessation of liability, and the non-consideration of the set off of brought forward loss by share premium. The Court found no substantial legal questions necessitating review, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
|
