Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 10 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
Appeal against order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2007-08 - Disallowance of provision for liability on account of pension scheme u/s 43B.

Analysis:
1. The Commissioner invoked proceedings u/s 263 due to the disallowance of &8377; 273.60 lacs made by the assessee towards the pension scheme under section 43B. The assessee argued that the provision was based on actuarial valuation and allowable as per AS 15. However, the Commissioner found the order u/s 143(3) erroneous for not disallowing the provision, prejudicial to revenue.

2. The Authorized Representative contended that the Assessing Officer accepted the claim after due consideration, and the revision order was based on a change of opinion. Citing relevant case laws, the representative argued that the Commissioner cannot overturn the decision merely due to disagreement. The DR argued that the assessment order lacked enquiry on the pension scheme liability.

3. The ITAT observed that the assessment order did not discuss the provision for the pension scheme, indicating a lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer. The absence of any query raised by the Assessing Officer and the silence in the assessment order on this issue led to the conclusion of non-application of mind. Referring to the Malabar Ind. Co. Ltd. case, the ITAT found the assessment order erroneous and justified the Commissioner's invocation of section 263.

4. The ITAT noted that the Commissioner failed to properly examine the allowability of the claim and erroneously applied section 43B to disallow the provision. Relying on the Ranbaxy Laboratories case, the ITAT directed the issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification and examination, emphasizing that the pension scheme did not involve regular contributions to a fund or trust, hence not falling under section 43B.

5. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the Commissioner's decision and instructing a proper verification and examination of the claim by the Assessing Officer as per law and relevant case laws cited by the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates