2015 (10) TMI 558 - SCH - Central Excise

Clandestine removal retraction of statements - Demand on the note books and pen-drive recovered from the premises of third party, who was a dealer of assessee Lack of evidence - Whether the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, was correct in holding that evidences collected by Departments are admissible evidences only for one offence while the same set of evidences only for one offence while the same set of evidence are insufficient to establish another offense - Supreme Court after condoning the delay dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue against the decision of High Court 2014 (5) TMI 606 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT ; wherein High court held that in the case of clandestine removal of excisable goods, there needs to be positive evidences for establishing the evasion, though contended by the Revenue. In absence of any material reflecting the purchase of excessive raw material, shortage of finished goods, excess consumption of power like electricity, seizure of cash, etc., the Tribunal noted and held that there was nothing to bank upon except the bare confessional statements of the proprietor and of some of the persons connected with the manufacturing activities and such statements were retracted within no time of their recording.