9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Deductibility of liability due to devaluation of Indian currency for assessment year 1967-68 Analysis: The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the deductibility of a liability of Rs. 57,103 arising from the devaluation of Indian currency for the assessment year 1967-68. The dispute centered around whether this liability was allowable as a deduction. The assessee, a company engaged in hiring out navigation receivers and equipment, had taken these on hire from a London company. The Income-tax Officer initially disallowed the liability as a deduction, stating it was a provision in the accounts towards the difference in exchange and no remittance was made during the relevant year. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision. However, the Tribunal disagreed, considering the liability as part of the original transaction of payment of hire charges and allowed it as a deduction. The Tribunal emphasized that the liability accrued during the year under consideration and was wholly and exclusively laid out for the assessee's business, thus meeting the criteria for deduction. The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle that a liability would be allowed as a deduction under the same head under which a part of it had been allowed in earlier years. The Tribunal noted that the liability was not separate from the original transaction and that the additional liability accrued due to the devaluation of the Indian currency. Citing the assessee's maintenance of accounts on a mercantile basis, the Tribunal concluded that the liability was a business liability and had to be allowed as a deduction. The Tribunal's reasoning aligned with the court's previous decision in Bestobell (India) Ltd. v. CIT, emphasizing that the loss or expenditure arising from devaluation was of a revenue nature and connected with the business, making it deductible. In light of the above analysis and the principles laid down in previous judgments, the High Court answered the reference question in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee. The judgment highlighted the mercantile basis of accounting, the business nature of the liability, and the connection between the additional liability and the original transaction of hire charges, leading to the allowance of the deduction. The decision underscored the importance of considering the nature of the loss or expenditure in connection with the business for determining deductibility under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
