9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Deductibility of interest payments u/s 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Deductibility of salary payments u/s 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Summary: Issue 1: Deductibility of Interest Payments u/s 40(b) The court examined whether the interest payments of Rs. 66,671 and Rs. 75,810 for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75, respectively, were deductible. The assessee, a partnership firm, paid interest to four partners who represented their Hindu joint families as "kartas." The Income-tax Officer disallowed the deduction, citing section 40(b) of the Act, which prohibits the deduction of interest paid to partners. The assessee argued that the partners invested their individual funds and received interest in their individual capacity, separate from their representative capacity. The court, following precedents from Addl. CIT v. Vallamkonda Chinna Balaiah Chetty & Co. and Terla Veeraiah v. CIT, held that interest paid to partners in their individual capacity is not disallowable u/s 40(b) if the partners act in a representative capacity for the partnership interest. The court also noted that the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act of 1984, effective from the assessment year 1985-86, supports this view by clarifying that interest paid to partners in their individual capacity is not disallowable. Issue 2: Deductibility of Salary Payments u/s 40(b) The court also considered whether the salary payments of Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 24,000 for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75, respectively, were deductible. The partnership firm paid salaries to two partners for services rendered individually, although they were partners in a representative capacity. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the deduction u/s 40(b). The court held that the principle of "real recipient" applies to salary payments as well. If the salary is paid for individual services and has no real connection with the partnership interest held by the joint family, it is not disallowable u/s 40(b). The court found that the salary paid to the partners was assessed in their individual hands, indicating no connection with the joint family's partnership interest. Thus, the salary payments were not disallowable u/s 40(b). Conclusion: The court answered both questions in the negative, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, holding that both interest and salary payments made to partners in their individual capacity were deductible and not disallowable u/s 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
