9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (1) TMI 600 - AT - Income TaxBenefit of exemption u/s.11 denied - non submission of Form No.10 along with return of income - Held that - As decided in CIT Vs. Mayur Foundation 2004 (12) TMI 48 - GUJARAT High Court audit report in Form 10CCB can be filed during appeal proceedings as the same are continuation of assessment proceedings. Since the assessee in the instant case has filed Form 10 before CIT(A) which is continuation of assessment proceedings, i.e. in other words has filed the FormNo.10 before completion of assessment proceedings, therefore, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee is entitled to claim the benefit of section 11 of the I.T. Act. We accordingly set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the AO to allow benefit of deduction u/s.11 as per law. - Decided in favour of assessee
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reopening of assessment under Section 147. 2. Denial of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 for donations received. 3. Requirement and timing of filing Form No. 10 for accumulation of income. Detailed Analysis: 1. Validity of Reopening of Assessment under Section 147: The assessee challenged the validity of the reopening of assessment under Section 147. However, this ground was not pressed by the assessee during the hearing, and thus, it was dismissed as 'not pressed'. 2. Denial of Exemption under Sections 11 and 12 for Donations Received: The main contention revolved around the denial of exemption for donations amounting to Rs. 20,70,000/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that the donations were not genuine and were actually capitation fees disguised as donations. The AO observed that the trust did not provide sufficient evidence to verify the genuineness of the donations, such as the identity of volunteers or donors, and there were no expenses shown for printing coupons used to collect donations. Furthermore, the AO noted that during a search on an associated individual, unaccounted cash and documents indicating capitation fees were found, leading to the conclusion that the donations were not voluntary. The Tribunal, however, referred to its previous decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2006-07, where it was held that such donations cannot be considered as corpus donations but can be considered for exemption under Section 11 as revenue receipts. The Tribunal reiterated that since the donations did not have specific directions to be treated as corpus, they should be treated as revenue receipts eligible for exemption under Section 11. 3. Requirement and Timing of Filing Form No. 10 for Accumulation of Income: The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision that Form No. 10, required for accumulation of income under Section 11(2), was not filed along with the return of income and thus denied the exemption. The assessee argued that Form No. 10 can be filed at any time during the assessment proceedings or even before the appellate authorities, citing various judicial precedents. The Tribunal considered the decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2006-07 and other judicial precedents, including the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Nagpur Hotel Owners Association and the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's decision in CIT vs. Mayur Foundation. These decisions established that Form No. 10 can be filed at any time before the completion of assessment proceedings, including during appellate proceedings, as these are considered a continuation of the assessment process. The Tribunal concluded that since the assessee filed Form No. 10 during the appellate proceedings, which are a continuation of the assessment proceedings, the assessee is entitled to the benefit of Section 11. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the exemption under Section 11 as per law. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly. It upheld the denial of corpus donation status to the donations but granted exemption under Section 11 by treating them as revenue receipts. It also allowed the belated filing of Form No. 10 during appellate proceedings, directing the AO to grant the benefit of Section 11 accordingly.
|
