9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Deductibility of business expenditure under Section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Validity of the Tribunal's finding allowing 50% of the entertainment expenditure as customary hospitality. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Deductibility of Business Expenditure under Section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The primary issue was whether the expenditure incurred by the assessee on providing coffee, tea, and other refreshments to customers could be classified as business expenditure and thus be deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initially disallowed these expenses, treating them as entertainment expenditure. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) deleted the disallowance, holding that such expenses were not entertainment expenditure but customary hospitality. The Tribunal, upon further appeal, remanded the case back to the AAC due to lack of evidence, and the AAC confirmed the addition again. The Tribunal, on subsequent appeal by the assessee, allowed 50% of the expenditure, recognizing it as customary hospitality. The High Court emphasized that the distinction between customary hospitality and entertainment expenditure was settled in the case of Karuppuswamy Nadar & Sons [1979] 120 ITR 140 (Mad), where it was held that expenses on coffee and tea do not constitute entertainment expenditure but are business-related and deductible under Section 37(1). The High Court declined to direct the Tribunal to refer the question to it, stating that the matter was already settled by the Division Bench and there was no need to revisit it, even though a similar issue was pending before the Supreme Court. 2. Validity of the Tribunal's Finding Allowing 50% of the Entertainment Expenditure as Customary Hospitality: The second issue was whether the Tribunal's decision to allow 50% of the claimed expenditure as deductible was based on valid materials and a reasonable view. The Tribunal allowed 50% of the expenditure due to the lack of specific evidence, given the lapse of time, and based on the earlier finding that the expenditure was related to providing coffee and tea to customers. The High Court found that the Tribunal's decision was a reasonable estimate given the circumstances and the nature of the assessee's business. The court noted that the Tribunal's decision was in line with the principle that such expenditure, even if not fully documented due to the passage of time, could be reasonably estimated. The High Court held that this did not raise a substantial question of law warranting a reference. Conclusion: The High Court rejected the Revenue's petitions under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to direct the Tribunal to refer the questions to the court. The court reiterated that the distinction between customary hospitality and entertainment expenditure was well-settled by precedent, and the Tribunal's decision to allow 50% of the expenditure was a reasonable exercise of discretion. The assessee was awarded costs of Rs. 250 from the Revenue.
|
