Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2016 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (2) TMI 531 - HC - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Eligibility for exemption as a Small Scale Industry (SSI) due to the use of registered trademarks by suppliers.
2. Validity of show cause notice and Order-in-Original issued by the Department.
3. Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the ownership of brand names.
4. Department's failure to raise grounds before the CESTAT regarding the use of registered trademarks by suppliers.
5. CESTAT's decision on entitlement to exemption under the SSI notification.
6. Maintainability of the appeal before the High Court.

Analysis:
1. The Appellant argued that the Respondents were ineligible for SSI exemption due to their suppliers using registered trademarks, as discovered in documents from September 2015. The contention was based on Notification No. 8/2003-Central Excise, which could affect the Respondents' eligibility for the exemption.

2. The appeal stemmed from a show cause notice issued in September 2008 and the subsequent Order-in-Original from September 2009. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Respondents' appeal in July 2010, emphasizing the Department's burden to prove ownership of brand names not belonging to the Respondents.

3. The Department failed to raise the issue of suppliers using registered trademarks before the CESTAT, despite possessing relevant information. The Court criticized the Department for not presenting this crucial evidence earlier and deemed it unjustified to introduce it years after the initial show cause notice.

4. The CESTAT determined that even if affixing stickers to footwear constituted manufacturing, the Respondents would still qualify for SSI exemption. The Court found no substantial legal question in this factual determination, rejecting the Respondent's objection on the appeal's maintainability before the Supreme Court.

5. Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the appeal and application, affirming the CESTAT's decision on exemption entitlement under the SSI notification. The judgment concluded the legal proceedings related to the Department's allegations and the Respondents' eligibility for the exemption.

This detailed analysis covers the various issues addressed in the judgment, highlighting the legal arguments, decisions, and implications for each aspect of the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates