9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the profits from transactions in shares of Hindustan Motors Ltd. are includible under the head 'Business' for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64. 2. Whether the profits from transactions in shares of Century Spinning and Weaving Company Ltd. are includible under the head 'Business' for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64. Issue-wise Summary: Issue 1: Transactions in Shares of Hindustan Motors Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that the transactions in Hindustan Motors Ltd. shares were in the nature of trading transactions based on several factors: - The preference shares had an option for conversion into ordinary shares. - Ordinary shares were quoted at a higher rate, offering an advantage in conversion. - The assessee-company converted the preference shares into ordinary shares. - The magnitude of the purchase was significant. - The shares were quoted on the Stock Exchange and were easily disposable. - The conduct of the assessee in converting shares, selling them through brokers, and borrowing money for the initial purchase. The Tribunal's conclusion was challenged by the assessee-company on grounds that: - The Tribunal considered neutral factors and conjectures. - Certain material facts were omitted from consideration. - The time-lag in transactions and the magnitude of the purchase were not substantial. - The Tribunal ignored the falling price of shares during the sale period. The High Court held that the Tribunal's findings were based on relevant evidence and applied the correct legal tests. The cumulative effect of all facts indicated that the transactions were in the nature of trading activity. The High Court thus answered Question No. 1 in the affirmative, against the assessee-company and in favor of the Department. Issue 2: Transactions in Shares of Century Spinning and Weaving Company Ltd. The Tribunal found that the transactions in Century shares were not trading transactions, based on factors such as: - The assessee placed a significant portion of the shares in its investment account. - There was only one transaction of sale in each of the two years under consideration. - No further transactions of sale occurred until 1972. - The Revenue treated the profit from the sale of shares in 1972-73 as a capital gain. The Department challenged this finding, arguing that: - The Tribunal did not consider the presumption that right shares are accretions to stock-in-trade. - The balance of 605 shares was not sold until 1972-73. - The Tribunal's reliance on the 1972-73 assessment year was erroneous as the principle of res judicata does not apply in income-tax matters. The High Court held that the Tribunal's conclusion was based on a comprehensive consideration of all relevant materials and was a finding of fact. The Tribunal correctly applied the rule of consistency, and the Department failed to show differing circumstances for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64. Therefore, the High Court answered Question No. 2 in the negative, in favor of the assessee-company and against the Department. Conclusion: The High Court answered the reference accordingly, with no order as to costs.
|
