9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against dismissal for failure to comply with court's order to supply paper-books within the prescribed time. Analysis: The Supreme Court granted special leave in an appeal against the Calcutta High Court's order dismissing the appeal due to non-compliance with the order to prepare and supply paper-books within the specified time frame. The High Court had previously condoned a default but dismissed the appeal upon subsequent non-compliance. The Supreme Court directed notice issuance and stay of dispossession, subject to filing paper-books within four weeks. Another related civil appeal became infructuous due to the withdrawal of an order granting leave to amend the plaint. The Supreme Court disposed of the infructuous appeal and set the present appeal for hearing. The appellant contended that the present appeal had also become infructuous due to another order, but the Supreme Court found no evidence of the High Court withdrawing the order dismissing the appeal for failure to supply paper-books. Emphasizing the importance of obeying court orders, the Court noted that penalties for non-compliance should be proportionate to the lapse. Quoting Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, the Court highlighted that procedural steps should not impede access to justice. The Court criticized the High Court's approach, suggesting that directing the respondents to prepare paper-books and imposing costs on the appellants would have been more effective in expediting the appeal. The Supreme Court found the High Court's penalty disproportionate and interfered in the matter. The appellants had since supplied the paper-books, leading the Court to allow the appeal, set aside the dismissal order, and remit the case back to the High Court for expeditious disposal. The High Court was given the discretion to handle the appeal as it deemed fit, with no costs imposed on either party.
|
