Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (12) TMI 1320 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Challenge to the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by the Revenue regarding the Assessee's Appeal.

Analysis:
The Appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the Assessee's Appeal. The Assessee had filed an Appeal in the Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Revenue contended that two questions of law raised by them were substantial. The first question was argued to be covered by a Division Bench judgment, while the second question was not covered. The main issue revolved around the commencement of a construction project by the Assessee under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue argued that the Assessee had received a commencement certificate, allowing them to start the project, while the Assessee's counsel argued that the certificate had lapsed or was invalidated by the time the construction started. The Tribunal considered the facts and found in favor of the Assessee.

The Senior Counsel for the Assessee argued that the commencement certificate issued earlier was not valid by the time construction began, as it had expired or been canceled. He also pointed out the requirement for clearance under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, for which an exemption was needed. The Tribunal took into account the facts presented by the Assessee and concluded that the earlier commencement certificates were no longer valid by the time construction commenced. Therefore, the Assessee was eligible for the benefit under section 80IB(10) of the Act. The Tribunal's decision was based on factual findings and admitted material, which were not considered erroneous by the High Court. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's conclusion and dismissed the Appeal, stating that no substantial question of law was raised.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates