Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2017 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (8) TMI 1488 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
- Violation of rules of natural justice in passing orders without notice to the Appellants/Corporate Debtors.
- Interpretation of Inter-se Agreement between financial creditors and lead bank.
- Binding nature of Inter-se Agreement on non-signatory Corporate Debtors.

Analysis:
1. The appeals challenged orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, admitting applications for insolvency resolution against the Corporate Debtors. The Appellants contended that the orders violated natural justice as no notice was given to them. However, the Respondent provided evidence that notices were sent to the Appellants, and the rules of natural justice were followed before admitting the applications.

2. The Appellants argued that the financial creditor had waived its rights in favor of the lead bank through an Inter-se Agreement. The Agreement recognized the lead bank and second lead bank, outlining their roles and decision-making authority. The Tribunal held that such agreements do not bind non-signatory Corporate Debtors, and the financial creditors' right to file for insolvency under Section 7 of the I&B Code cannot be overridden by the Inter-se Agreement.

3. The Tribunal emphasized that the financial creditors, either individually or jointly, have the right to initiate insolvency proceedings under the I&B Code. The Inter-se Agreement between financial creditors does not negate this right. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the submission made by the Appellants and dismissed both appeals for lack of merit. No costs were awarded in the circumstances of the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates