9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Income-tax assessment of Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1938-39. Analysis: The judgment pertains to two references under Section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act concerning the income-tax assessment of a Hindu undivided family. The primary issue revolves around whether a specific sum should be deemed as income taxable in the assessment year 1938-39. The family was a partner in a collieries business, and the dispute arose regarding the treatment of certain amounts received from the collieries. The Income-tax Officer found discrepancies in the account books, including a surplus balance and unposted items. The contention was whether these amounts should be considered as profits of the previous year. The Commissioner of Income-tax argued that the surplus balance should be deemed as profit post the collieries' closure. Reference was made to a judicial decision emphasizing an assessee's right to treat certain monies as income for a particular year based on their accounting method. The judgment delves into the treatment of sums received in previous years and the discretion of the assessee in allocating them as income for a specific year. The court analyzed the nature of the amounts in question, such as the surplus balance, unposted items, and transferred sums, to determine if they could be classified as profits for the previous year. The court highlighted the importance of the assessee's intention in treating these amounts as income for a particular year. It was observed that the mere detection of income in a specific year does not warrant its automatic classification as income for that year, especially if it had escaped assessment in previous years. The court scrutinized the actions of the Income-tax Officer in deducting a specific amount from the total and concluded that the disputed sum should not be considered as income taxable in the assessment year 1938-39. The judgment was delivered by Justice Malik, with Justice Seth concurring. The court ruled that the disputed sum could not be deemed as income, profits, or gains of the previous year assessable to income tax in the assessment year 1938-39. The court also awarded costs to the assessee. The decision provides clarity on the treatment of income discrepancies and underscores the significance of an assessee's deliberate allocation of funds as income for a specific year based on their accounting practices.
|
