9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (9) TMI 1788 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance of interest expenditure while computing income under normal provisions of the Act - assessee is also contesting the book profit computed u/s 115JB of the Act - HELD THAT - The assessee is one of the notified entities coming under Harshad Mehta group against whom stock scam charges are pending. With regard to above said issue relating to rejection of interest claim these issues are being set aside by the Tribunal to the file of ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in all other group cases belonging to Harshad Mehta. See FORTUNE HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. VERSUS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-CC-31, MUMBAI 2015 (8) TMI 1353 - ITAT MUMBAI . Charging of interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C - Held that - Set aside the matter of computation of interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act to the file of the assessing officer with similar directions
Issues:
- Delay in filing appeals due to funds release by custodian - Disallowance of interest expenditure under normal provisions of the Act - Disallowance of interest liability under section 115JB of the Act - Computation of interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act Analysis: Issue 1: Delay in filing appeals due to funds release by custodian The assessees, belonging to a specific group, filed appeals that were barred by limitation due to delays ranging from 383 to 760 days. The assessees sought condonation of the delay, attributing it to the custodian's delay in releasing funds for appeal fees. The AR argued that similar delays had been condoned in previous cases due to reasons beyond the assessees' control. The standing counsel opposed, stating the assessees should have taken precautions. The tribunal, considering past decisions and the uncontrollable nature of the delays, condoned the delay and proceeded to hear the appeals on merits. Issue 2: Disallowance of interest expenditure under normal provisions of the Act The appeals contested the disallowance of interest expenditure while computing income under normal provisions of the Act. The AR referred to past cases where similar issues were set aside for fresh adjudication. The tribunal, in line with previous decisions, set aside the orders passed by CIT(A) on this issue in all appeals and directed the matter to be restored to the file of CIT(A) with similar directions given in prior cases. Issue 3: Disallowance of interest liability under section 115JB of the Act The issue of interest liability under section 115JB of the Act was raised in the case of one of the assessees. The tribunal noted that this issue was interconnected with the disallowance of interest expenditure under normal provisions. The tribunal set aside the orders passed by CIT(A) on this issue in all appeals and directed the matter to be restored to the file of CIT(A) with similar directions given in prior cases. Issue 4: Computation of interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act The common issue of charging interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act was raised. The tribunal referred to a division bench case for guidance and set aside the matter of computation of interest to the file of the assessing officer with similar directions given in the prior case. Consequently, all appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes. This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, detailing the arguments presented, previous decisions cited, and the tribunal's final rulings on each matter.
|
