9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The issue involved in this case is whether the activity of putting mushroom powder into gelatin capsules amounts to manufacturing activity for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Facts and Decision: The assessee, a private limited company engaged in the sale of ayurvedic products, claimed a deduction under section 80-IB of the Act for filling raw material (powder) into gelatin capsules. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim, stating that this activity does not constitute manufacturing. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the decision. The Tribunal noted that in a previous case involving the same assessee, it was held that putting mushroom powder into capsules did not create a new or distinct product. The Tribunal concluded that the activity did not amount to manufacturing, thus denying the deduction under section 80-IB. Interest Levy Dispute: The assessee also contested the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Act. The assessee argued that the interest was not justified, citing a case law precedent. However, the Tribunal observed that the interest was charged by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order itself. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal held that the interest levied for defaults in tax payments was mandatory. As the assessing authority had specifically mentioned the interest charges, the case law cited by the assessee was deemed inapplicable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the interest levy. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decision to deny the deduction under section 80-IB for the activity of filling mushroom powder into gelatin capsules, as it did not constitute manufacturing. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, citing the mandatory nature of such interest as per Supreme Court rulings.
|
