Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2006 (5) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (5) TMI 546 - SC - Indian Laws

Issues:
Bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenged before the Supreme Court.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged the rejection of his bail application by the Special Judge of the Bombay High Court under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999. The investigation was handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation due to alleged connivance of some Bombay Police officials. The appellant, a Deputy Superintendent of Stamps, was accused of aiding an organized crime syndicate by not taking action against individuals involved in the production and supply of fake stamps. The appellant denied his involvement, arguing against being found guilty of organized crime. The Special Court, after considering the materials, concluded that the appellant had indeed supported the organized crime syndicate, leading to the rejection of his bail application.

In the appeal, the appellant contended that no prima facie case existed for conviction under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The appellant's counsel emphasized the criteria for granting regular bail under Section 439 of the Code. On the other hand, the CBI argued that the appellant was an insider in the conspiracy, and Section 3(2) of the MCOCA was applicable, justifying the refusal of bail by the High Court. The Supreme Court, while acknowledging the seriousness of the alleged crime, focused on the bail application's merit. Despite the gravity of the offense, the Court found it a fit case for granting bail to the appellant, reversing the Special Court's decision. The appellant was directed to furnish security, provide sureties, report to the Investigating Officer monthly, and surrender his passport, if applicable, before the Special Court.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting bail to the appellant with specific conditions to ensure his compliance with the legal requirements.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates