2015 (5) TMI 1202 - HC - Income Tax

Deduction u/s 80 HHC by excluding 90% net profit on account of hire of barge charges, Machinery and Shipping agency fees - HELD THAT - Aforesaid question now stands concluded against the revenue and in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Supreme Court in ACG Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 2012 (2) TMI 101 - SUPREME COURT We must record the caveat put forth by Mr. Pardiwala, the learned counsel for the respondent that this agreement is without prejudice to the contentions taken in the appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment (Assessment Year 1996-1997) - Substantial question of law is answered in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the respondent assessee and against the revenue.

Summary

Issues:
1. Challenge to Tribunal's order under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Interpretation of Section 80 HHC deduction for assessment year 1996-1997.

Analysis:
1. The High Court of Bombay heard an appeal challenging the Income Tax Appeal Tribunal's order dated 4 April 2006 under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal questioned the Tribunal's direction to recompute the deduction under Section 80 HHC for the assessment year 1996-1997. The main issue was whether the Assessing Officer should exclude 90% of the net profit on account of hire charges, machinery, and shipping agency fees, as per Explanation (baa) to Section 80 HHC. The Tribunal's decision was based on this interpretation.

2. The substantial question of law in this case was whether the Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the deduction under Section 80 HHC by excluding specific charges from the net profit. Both parties referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in ACG Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 243 ITR 89, which favored the assessee. The counsel for the respondent clarified that their agreement was without prejudice to the contentions in the appeal filed by the assessee for the same assessment year. The High Court ultimately agreed with the respondent-assessee, citing the Supreme Court decision, and dismissed the appeal in favor of the assessee.

3. The High Court's decision was based on the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and the precedent set by the Supreme Court. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistent application of tax laws and referred to specific clauses and explanations within Section 80 HHC to support the decision. The court's ruling favored the assessee based on the specific circumstances and legal interpretations presented during the proceedings. The judgment emphasized the need for clarity and adherence to statutory provisions in tax assessments, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no costs imposed.