9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
1. Validity of the acquisition process. 2. Quantum of compensation. 3. Deductions for development charges. 4. Deductions for de-escalation. 5. Deductions for the waiting period. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Validity of the acquisition process: The Gulbarga Development Authority issued a preliminary notification under section 15(1) of the City Improvement Trust Board Act, 1976, on 13.5.1982, to acquire 144 acres of land for a residential layout. The final notification was issued on 14.12.1989, acquiring land from the appellants. The Land Acquisition Officer announced the award on 7.7.1990, fixing the market value at Rs. 4,100/- per acre for Badepur and Rs. 13,500/- per acre for Rajapur. The landowner filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition, but the High Court dismissed it on 12.8.1991, holding the acquisition process lawful. 2. Quantum of compensation: The Reference Court enhanced the compensation from Rs. 4,100/- per acre to Rs. 1,46,000/- per acre based on a sale deed dated 30.12.1983. The High Court remitted the matter to the Reference Court to reconsider deductions, which then re-determined the compensation at Rs. 1,45,000/- per acre. The High Court reduced this to Rs. 65,000/- per acre, leading to the appeals before the Supreme Court. 3. Deductions for development charges: The High Court applied a 55% deduction for developmental charges, which the appellants argued was arbitrary and without reason. The Supreme Court noted that deductions for development are necessary to balance the differential factors between the exemplar land and the acquired land. Based on past precedents, the Court found that deductions up to 67% could be justified for undeveloped land. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's 55% deduction as reasonable. 4. Deductions for de-escalation: The Reference Court allowed a 3% annual deduction for de-escalation, but the High Court increased it to 10%. The Supreme Court referenced cases where escalation rates ranged from 7.5% to 10% per annum and upheld the 10% deduction by the High Court, noting that land prices generally rise and the period in question exceeded one year. 5. Deductions for the waiting period: The High Court applied a 5% deduction for the waiting period, which was not contested by the appellants during the hearing. The Supreme Court upheld this deduction, referencing past judgments where waiting period deductions were deemed appropriate. Conclusion: The Supreme Court found no merit in the appellants' contention that no developmental expenses were incurred on the acquired land. It upheld the High Court's deductions of 55% for development, 10% for de-escalation, and 5% for the waiting period, totaling 70%, which is within the permissible range of up to 75%. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision to award Rs. 65,000/- per acre as compensation, maintaining consistency with previous judicial determinations. The appeals were dismissed.
|
