9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Admissibility of business expenditure u/s 30 to 37 of the Income Tax Act. 2. Deduction of expenses u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Summary: Issue 1: Admissibility of Business Expenditure u/s 30 to 37 of the Income Tax Act The assessee filed its return for the assessment year 2007-08 declaring nil income, claiming business expenditure under Sections 30 to 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The business was under liquidation, and expenses on employees' remuneration, interest on bank loans, administration, selling, and distribution were incurred. The Assessing Officer disallowed the business expenditure, holding that the assessee was not carrying on any business activity. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal and remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer. The High Court found no merit in the appeal, stating that the business of the assessee was closed, and income from interest was chargeable to tax as 'income from other sources' under Section 56 of the Act. Issue 2: Deduction of Expenses u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act The assessee argued that the expenses should be deductible u/s 57(iii) of the Act, as they were incurred for earning interest income. The High Court examined the provision and relevant case law, including the Supreme Court's decision in Vijaya Laxmi Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1991) and the High Court's decision in Consumer Electronics (Punjab) Ltd. Vs. ACIT. The Court concluded that for expenses to be deductible u/s 57(iii), there must be a nexus between the expenditure and the earning of the income. The Court found no evidence that the expenses were incurred to earn interest income. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision in favor of the revenue was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.
|
