9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax amount and penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. Analysis: The appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax amount and penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing ERW Precision Steel Tubes, utilized the services of Goods Transport Operators. Initially, the Goods Transport Operators were brought under Service Tax by notification, later amended to include service recipients. The Apex Court's decision in Laghu Udyog Bharati v. Union of India held provisions of the Finance Act to be ultra vires, thus duty collection during the relevant period was deemed unnecessary. The appellant's counsel cited various cases in support of this argument. The learned SDR contended that even post-amendment of the Finance Act, the notification remained applicable for the earlier period, citing LH Sugar Factories Ltd. v. CCE. Additionally, reference was made to the clarification provided by the Apex Court in Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. v. Union of India regarding the ruling in Laghu Udyog Bharati. Upon careful consideration of the arguments, it was noted that the issue had already been addressed by the Apex Court in Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. The Tribunal's Larger Bench had also ruled that duty demand could not be upheld against service providers for the relevant period. Consequently, in light of the judgments referenced by the appellant's counsel, the pre-deposit of service tax and penalty were waived, and their recovery stayed pending the appeal's disposal. The stay application was granted, with instructions for the matter to proceed for final hearing before a Single Member Bench.
|
