9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Deduction of liabilities for direct taxes in computing net wealth. 2. Inclusion of assets inherited from the deceased father in the net wealth of the assessee. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Deduction of Liabilities for Direct Taxes in Computing Net Wealth Assessment Years 1964-65 and 1965-66: The primary question was whether the liabilities for direct taxes should be deducted according to the returns submitted by the assessee or the taxes ultimately found payable. The Tribunal had allowed the deduction of the taxes ultimately found payable, reversing the AAC's decision, which had not accepted this contention. The Tribunal's view was upheld, affirming that the taxes ultimately found payable should be deducted. This conclusion aligns with the definition of "net wealth" under Section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, which necessitates the deduction of debts owed by the assessee on the valuation date. The rationale is that the final determination of tax liabilities during the assessment proceedings should replace the estimated amounts initially claimed. Issue 2: Inclusion of Assets Inherited from the Deceased Father in the Net Wealth of the Assessee Assessment Year 1964-65: The Tribunal initially held that Section 19A, which was inserted from 1st April 1965, was not applicable to the assessment year 1964-65. Consequently, the assets inherited from the father should not be included in the net wealth of the assessee for this year. However, upon further review, it was determined that the inherited assets should indeed be included in the assessee's net wealth. The court emphasized that inheritance is never in abeyance, and the property devolves on the heir immediately upon the death of the deceased. Thus, the assets belonged to the assessee on the valuation date, making them part of his net wealth under the substantive provisions of Section 3 of the Act. Assessment Year 1965-66: For the assessment year 1965-66, the Tribunal had included the inherited assets in the assessee's net wealth, as the assessee was the full owner of the assets on the valuation date. This decision was consistent with the provisions of Section 19A, which was applicable from 1st April 1965. The court upheld this view, reiterating that the inherited assets should be included in the net wealth of the assessee. The court also clarified that the provisions of Sections 19 and 19A did not alter the fundamental principle that the inherited property belonged to the assessee and should be assessed as part of his net wealth. Conclusion: Questions Nos. 1 and 3: The taxes ultimately found payable are to be deducted, affirming the Tribunal's decision. Questions Nos. 2 and 4: The value of the assets inherited from the assessee's father is to be included in the net wealth of the assessee. This conclusion was reached by affirming the Revenue's contention and rejecting the assessee's argument that the estate was under administration and should be assessed separately.
|
