Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1979 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1979 (11) TMI 8 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
Whether the sales tax refund is taxable in the hands of the assessee for the assessment year 1969-70?

Analysis:
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh addressed the issue of whether a sales tax refund of Rs. 55,611 was taxable in the hands of the assessee for the assessment year 1969-70. The assessee, a partnership firm, dealt in tobacco and imported it from other states. The firm challenged the levy of sales tax and filed a civil suit for refund, which was eventually allowed by the Supreme Court. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) taxed the refund amount based on the mercantile system of accounting, citing Section 41 of the Income Tax Act. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) upheld the ITO's decision on different grounds, leading the assessee to appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal).

The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's decision in Chowringhee Sales Bureau P.Ltd. v. CIT, determined that the sales tax refund was a trading receipt. However, it concluded that since Section 41(1) of the Act did not apply, the amount was not taxable under any other provision. The Tribunal also held that the refund should be taxed based on the accounting system regularly followed by the assessee. The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's reasoning, stating that if an amount constitutes a trading receipt and is accrued or received in the assessment year, it should be taxable in that year. The Court distinguished the facts of a previous Supreme Court case and emphasized that the sales tax refund was a revenue receipt when the Supreme Court upheld the claim, not when the tax was initially recovered.

Furthermore, the Court rejected the argument that the sales tax collection was made by an individual and not the assessee seeking the refund, as this contention was given up by the assessee before the Tribunal. The Court noted that the liabilities and assets of the proprietary concern were taken over by the assessee-firm, making it liable for the tax. Ultimately, the Court held that the sales tax refund was taxable in the assessment year in question, ruling against the assessee. The parties were directed to bear their own costs in the reference.

In conclusion, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh determined that the sales tax refund was taxable in the hands of the assessee for the assessment year 1969-70, rejecting the Tribunal's reasoning and emphasizing the timing of the revenue receipt based on the Supreme Court's decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates