9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Taxability of proceeds generated on sale of DEPB/DFRC u/s 147 r/w 143(3) for assessment year 2004-05.
The appeal filed by the assessee challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals)-IX at Chennai dated 28.3.2013, relating to the assessment year 2004-05 completed u/s 143(3), read with sec.147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 1. Jurisdiction and Merits of Reassessment: The assessee contended that the re-assessment u/s 147 r/w 143(3) was erroneous as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the four-year time limit, and the Assessing Officer's action was without jurisdiction. The appellant argued that the re-opening was a mere change of opinion and not based on any omission of material facts. The appellant also cited relevant case laws to support their argument against the validity of the reassessment. 2. Taxability of DEPB/DFRC Sale Proceeds: The assessing authority reopened the assessment based on the amended law brought in by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2005, regarding the taxability of DEPB/DFRC sale proceeds. However, the appellant had originally furnished all details during the initial assessment u/s 143(3). The Hon'ble Bombay High Court's decision emphasized that retrospective amendments do not imply failure to disclose material facts by the assessee. The reassessment made after the expiry of four years from the relevant previous year was deemed unsustainable in law. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's ruling further supported that retrospective amendments are not valid in law, leading to the setting aside of lower authorities' orders on the taxability issue. In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, pronouncing the order in open court on Monday, the 18th of November, 2013, at Chennai.
|
