Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2019 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (9) TMI 1553 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Alleged wrong availment of cenvat credit, contravention of Rule 8 (3) of Central Excise Rules, 2002, legality of Rule 8 (3A)

In the case, the appellant, a refractories manufacturer, was accused of wrongly availing cenvat credit and contravening Rule 8 (3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Adjudicating Authority disallowed a cenvat credit of &8377; 14,44,343/- for May 2008 and demanded &8377; 25,83,63,285/- for the period from July 2008 to March 2009, imposing a penalty as well. The appellant argued that Rule 8 (3A) was struck down by various High Courts as ultra vires, citing relevant cases. The Advocate contended that accumulated cenvat credit could be used for payment even during a default period, based on court decisions. The Department, however, mentioned that the issue was pending before the Supreme Court as they had challenged the High Court decisions. The Tribunal considered the High Court rulings and noted the Calcutta High Court's decision declaring a portion of Rule 8 (3A) as ultra vires. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that there was no restriction on using accumulated cenvat credit for paying Central Excise Duty during a default period. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates