9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Request for extension of interim relief, consideration of interim relief request.
Request for extension of interim relief: Mr. A.S. Vakil, counsel for respondent nos. 11 to 14, requested to extend the order of status quo till the next date of hearing. He argued that the interim relief granted in this matter was crucial for extending the interim relief in his case. However, Mr. S.N. Soparkar, representing the petitioner, stated that he is not pressing for any interim relief. Consideration of interim relief request: As the petitioner's counsel did not press for interim relief, the Court could not entertain Mr. Vakil's request to extend the interim relief. Consequently, the interim relief was not extended. Mr. R.A. Rindani, the learned AGP for the respondent State, requested for more time, which was granted until 26.10.2010. This judgment by the Gujarat High Court addressed the conflicting requests for extending interim relief in a legal matter. The Court's decision was based on the petitioner's stance of not pressing for interim relief, leading to the denial of the extension request made by the counsel for respondent nos. 11 to 14.
|
