9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (6) TMI 1079 - AT - Insolvency and BankruptcyPrayer for deciding application on time - HELD THAT - It is apprised that 20th July, 2021 has already been fixed for hearing before the Adjudicating Authority - Considering the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the parties. We request the Adjudicating Authority to decide aforesaid applications on priority basis preferably on 20th July, 2021. Appeal disposed off.
Issues:
- Request to direct Adjudicating Authority to decide Application I.A. No. 273 of 2021 filed by Respondent No. 1. - Request to direct Adjudicating Authority to decide Application I.A. No. 379 of 2021. - Fixing a hearing date before the Adjudicating Authority. - Disposal of the Appeal due to non-press by the Appellant. - Direction to the Registry to send the order copy to the Adjudicating Authority. Analysis: The judgment before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, involved several key issues. The first issue revolved around the request made by the Appellant's counsel to direct the Adjudicating Authority to decide the Application I.A. No. 273 of 2021 filed by Respondent No. 1 within a specified time frame. The counsel emphasized that if this direction was given, the purpose of filing the Appeal would be served, and consequently, the Appellant would not press the Appeal. The second issue in the judgment pertained to another request made by the Intervener's counsel to direct the Adjudicating Authority to decide the Application I.A. No. 379 of 2021. The Tribunal considered the submissions of all parties and decided to request the Adjudicating Authority to prioritize and decide both applications, preferably on the fixed hearing date of 20th July 2021. Furthermore, the judgment highlighted the importance of fixing a specific date for the hearing before the Adjudicating Authority, which was set for 20th July 2021. This decision aimed to ensure timely resolution and efficiency in the adjudication process. Subsequently, due to the directions given to the Adjudicating Authority and the non-pressing of the Appeal by the Appellant, the Tribunal disposed of the Appeal as not pressed, with no order as to costs. The final issue addressed in the judgment was the direction given to the Registry to send a copy of the order to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Ahmadabad) for necessary action and compliance.
|
