Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (10) TMI 1928 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Appeal against imposition of penalty u/s.271D & 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y.2007-08 & 2009-10.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai heard appeals filed by the Revenue challenging the order of CIT(A)-49, Mumbai regarding the imposition of penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2007-08 & 2009-10. The Tribunal considered a previous decision of the Bombay High Court where a similar penalty was deleted. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer had levied penalties for accepting loans through journal entries, citing a judgment which held that such transactions could violate provisions of the Act but penalties could be avoided with reasonable cause. The Tribunal also referenced a case involving Lodha group where similar penalties were deemed unsustainable due to reasonable cause. The Tribunal approved the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the penalties based on the High Court's judgment in the group case, as the facts were similar. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

The Tribunal reviewed the orders of the lower authorities and a previous case involving group concerns where penalties under sections 271D and 271E were found not leviable based on the decision of the Bombay High Court in the Triumph International Finance case. It was observed that there was a reasonable cause for using general entries to square all accounts. As the facts and circumstances were similar to the previous case, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalties under sections 271D and 271E. Subsequently, all appeals of the Revenue were dismissed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates