2007 (11) TMI 41 - HC - Income Tax

Valuation of Stock - AO doesn t permitted the assessee to make change in valuation of the opening stock although it permitted a change in the closing stock but tribunal rejected the order of AO and permitted adjustment in both opening and closing stock - HC upheld the order of tribunal

Summary

Issues:
Adjustment of opening stock valuation under Section 145 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
1. The primary issue in this case revolves around the adjustment of the opening stock valuation by the assessee for the assessment year 1999-2000 under Section 145 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee had made an adjustment in the opening stock as on 1st April, 1998, to the extent of Rs.54,84,272/-, which was challenged by the Assessing Officer citing Section 145 A of the Act. The Assessing Officer contended that the change in valuation of opening stock was not permissible under Section 145 A, although a change in the closing stock valuation was allowed.

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee but did not admit the claim regarding the adjustment in the opening stock valuation. Subsequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, relying on a decision by the Calcutta Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Mehra Electric Company 148 Taxman 37, Circular No. 772 dated 27th December, 1998 by the CBDT, and the guidance note issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

3. The Tribunal held that the adjustment on account of modvat credit and excise duty could be made in the opening stock as well, and the assessee did not err in doing so. The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle that any change in valuation at the closing stock end necessitates a corresponding adjustment at the opening stock end to reflect the true profit, as emphasized in Circular No. 772 and the guidance note.

4. The High Court, in its judgment, referred to the Privy Council's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Ahmedabad New Cotton Mills Co. LimitedAIR 1930 Privy Council 56, which highlighted the importance of consistent valuation methods for both opening and closing stock to reflect the true profit. The Court also emphasized the provisions of Section 145 A and the necessity of adjusting the opening stock valuation if there is a change in the closing stock valuation.

5. The Court rejected the Revenue's argument of the assessee receiving a double benefit, as outlined in the guidance note by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The Court clarified that any adjustment required by statute, such as Section 145 A, must be implemented regardless of its impact on income computation. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that a change in the closing stock valuation mandates a corresponding adjustment in the opening stock valuation to ensure accurate reflection of profit.

6. Ultimately, the Court disposed of the appeal in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision and emphasizing the importance of consistent valuation methods for both opening and closing stock to maintain the accuracy of profit computation under the Income Tax Act, 1961.