Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (12) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (12) TMI 1576 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
Withdrawal of application under Section 12A of IBC, 2016 and Regulation 30A of CIRP Regulations.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a CA filed by the Operational Creditor seeking withdrawal of the application under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Operational Creditor claimed to have settled the matter with the Corporate Debtor and requested permission to withdraw the case after recording the terms of settlement. The Operational Creditor argued that since a settlement had been reached, there was no need to involve the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) or constitute the Committee of Creditors (COC) based on previous orders. The Tribunal examined the provisions of Section 12A and Regulation 30A, which govern the withdrawal of applications admitted under Section 7, 9, or 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Tribunal highlighted the specific procedures outlined for withdrawal applications before and after the constitution of the COC.

The Tribunal noted that Section 12A allows for the withdrawal of applications admitted under Section 7, 9, or 10 of the IBC, while Regulation 30A specifies the process for such withdrawals. The judgment emphasized that withdrawals are permissible under two circumstances: before the admission of the application and before the constitution of the COC, or after admission and after the COC's constitution and the IRP's appointment. In this case, the application was admitted, the IRP was appointed, and the Operational Creditor was directed to deposit a specified amount. However, the Operational Creditor directly filed the application under Rule 11 without involving the IRP, contrary to the prescribed procedures under Section 12A and Regulation 30A.

The Tribunal concluded that the Operational Creditor did not follow the mandated procedures for withdrawal under Section 12A and Regulation 30A. Despite citing previous decisions in support of their position, the Tribunal found that those cases differed from the present scenario. As the present application was not filed in accordance with the statutory provisions, the Tribunal deemed it not maintainable and dismissed the application accordingly. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to the prescribed legal procedures for withdrawal applications under the IBC and CIRP Regulations to ensure compliance with the law and procedural fairness.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates