Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AAR Customs - 2021 (3) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (3) TMI 1359 - AAR - Customs


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of underground mining trucks.
2. Interpretation of relevant tariff headings and sub-headings.
3. Applicability of HSN explanatory notes.
4. Comparison with international classification practices.
5. Relevance of the Motor Vehicle Act and market perception.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Underground Mining Trucks:
The applicant, M/s. Sandvik Mining and Rock Technology India Pvt. Ltd., sought an advance ruling on the classification of underground mining trucks, specifically the Sandvik TH 320 model. The applicant proposed classification under sub-heading 8430 50 10 as mining machinery excluding coal mining, while an alternative classification under sub-heading 8704 10 10, which includes motor vehicles designed for off-highway use, was also considered.

2. Interpretation of Relevant Tariff Headings and Sub-Headings:
The Customs Tariff Act, 1975, groups commodities under 98 chapters, aligned with the World Customs Organization’s Harmonized System (HS). The applicant argued for classification under Heading 8430, which covers machinery for earth, minerals, or ores. However, the Commissioner opined that the product falls under Heading 8704, which covers motor vehicles for the transport of goods, including dumpers designed for off-highway use. The ruling emphasized that the primary function of the trucks is the transport of goods (mucking and tramming), aligning more with Heading 8704.

3. Applicability of HSN Explanatory Notes:
The Harmonized System (HS) explanatory notes are crucial for classification. The notes under Heading 8704 explicitly cover vehicles used for the transport of goods, including those used in mines. The ruling noted that the Sandvik TH 320 truck is designed for moving materials within mines, fitting the description under Heading 8704. The notes also distinguish these vehicles by their limited speed, special tyres, and off-road capabilities, further supporting classification under 8704 10.

4. Comparison with International Classification Practices:
The ruling highlighted that similar products by companies like Hitachi and Caterpillar are classified under Heading 8704 in other countries, including the United States. This international practice reinforced the decision to classify the Sandvik TH 320 under Heading 8704.

5. Relevance of the Motor Vehicle Act and Market Perception:
The applicant argued that the trucks should not be classified as motor vehicles under the Motor Vehicle Act, as they are designed for use in enclosed premises and not on public roads. However, the ruling clarified that the terms of the tariff headings and HSN explanatory notes take precedence over other statutes. The classification under Heading 8704 10 was found to be explicit and unambiguous, making references to the Motor Vehicle Act unnecessary. Additionally, the product’s marketing as a truck for moving ore/muck did not influence the classification, as the primary determinant is the tariff heading terms.

Conclusion:
The ruling concluded that the Sandvik TH 320 underground mining truck is classifiable under sub-heading 8704 10 10 as a motor vehicle for the transport of goods designed for off-highway use, specifically within mines. The decision was based on the product’s features, usage, and alignment with the HSN explanatory notes and international classification practices.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates