Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (5) TMI 718 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Disallowance of claim made under Section 80IB(10) for housing project completed under joint venture agreement.
2. Denial of Section 80IB(10) claim on the grounds of filing return after the due date prescribed under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Analysis:
1. The appellant contested the disallowance of the claim made under Section 80IB(10) for a housing project completed under a joint venture agreement. The appellant argued that the claim was in respect of a project completed jointly with another entity, and the denial of the claim was unjustified. The appellant highlighted that the joint venture arrangement should not affect the eligibility for the Section 80IB(10) deduction. However, the authorities rejected the claim, stating that certain certificates were obtained in the name of one of the associates, leading to the assumption that the projects were separate undertakings. The appellant's contentions were based on the joint completion of the project, but the authorities did not accept this argument, resulting in the disallowance of the claim under Section 80IB(10).

2. The second issue revolved around the denial of the Section 80IB(10) claim due to the late filing of the return beyond the due date specified under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant sought to justify the delay by filing an application for condonation of the delay before the CBDT under Section 119(2)(b). However, the application was rejected by the Board, and the appellant's subsequent writ petition challenging the rejection was pending before the jurisdictional high court. Despite these efforts, the authorities maintained that the return was filed beyond the prescribed due date, emphasizing the mandatory nature of filing the return within the specified timeline for claiming deductions under Chapter VIA. Citing relevant case law, the authorities upheld the decision to reject the deduction claimed under Section 80IB(10) due to the late filing of the return.

In conclusion, the appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision to dismiss the appellant's appeal, emphasizing the strict adherence to statutory timelines for filing returns and claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of complying with procedural requirements, such as filing returns within the prescribed due dates, to avail of tax benefits and deductions under the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates