Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2012 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (11) TMI 1320 - HC - Companies Law

Issues involved: Transfer of criminal proceedings, conflicting decisions, duplication of evidence, transfer to Special Court (Economic Offence)

In the present case, the petitioner sought to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.6906/2012 before the I Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore city. The respondent had initiated proceedings against the petitioner for various offences under IPC and the Companies Act, based on the same set of evidence. Concerns were raised regarding the potential for conflicting decisions, duplication of evidence, and waste of time if two separate proceedings were to continue before different courts. The court noted that there was no legal impediment for the Special Court (Economic Offence) to try offences under IPC linked with those under the Companies Act. However, it was clarified that proceedings before the Special Court could not be transferred to a regular Magistrate. Therefore, in the interest of efficiency and fairness to both parties, the court ordered the transfer of the proceedings in C.C.No.6906/2012 to the Special Court (Economic Offence) to be tried jointly with C.C.No.28/2012.

The High Court of Karnataka, in its judgment, disposed of the petition and ordered the transfer of the proceedings in C.C.No.6906/2012 from the I Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore to the Special Court (Economic Offence) in Bangalore. This transfer was directed to ensure that both sets of proceedings, involving offences under IPC and the Companies Act, could be tried together in accordance with the law. The court's decision aimed to prevent conflicting decisions, duplication of evidence, and streamline the legal process by consolidating related cases before the appropriate judicial forum.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates