9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Calculation of court fees for a suit involving a declaration with a consequential relief. 2. Determining the valuation of immovable property, specifically tenancy rights in a building, for court fee computation. Detailed Analysis: 1. The case involved a revision under section 115, C. P. C. by the plaintiffs against the order of the Additional Civil Judge, which confirmed the Munsiff's decision regarding court fees for a suit seeking a declaration and a permanent injunction. The plaintiffs challenged the court's decision that the relief for permanent injunction was a consequential relief, requiring court fees based on the market value of the bungalow. The plaintiffs contended that court fees should be based on the annual letting value of the property, not its market value. 2. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 7(iv) of the Court Fees Act to determine the computation of court fees for suits with a consequential relief. It was highlighted that in cases involving immovable property, the value of the consequential relief should be considered for court fee calculation. The court emphasized that the term "immovable property" includes benefits arising from land or buildings, and in the context of buildings, benefits such as tenancy rights can be deemed immovable property. 3. The judgment delved into the concept of tenancy rights as immovable property, emphasizing that the right of enjoyment derived from a building, such as a tenancy right, constitutes immovable property. The court clarified that the valuation of tenancy rights, being incapable of precise determination due to the nature of tenancy agreements, should be computed based on the annual rent or letting value of the property, with a minimum threshold for court fee calculation. 4. The court addressed the applicability of different subsections of Section 7 of the Court Fees Act to determine the valuation of tenancy rights in a building for court fee computation. It was noted that specific provisions related to land or gardens were not directly applicable to tenancy rights in buildings. However, the court referred to past judgments to establish a precedent where court fees for tenancy rights were based on the annual rent or letting value of the property. 5. In conclusion, the court partially allowed the revision and ordered that court fees should be payable based on the annual rent or letting value of the building for suits involving tenancy rights as immovable property. The judgment clarified that the valuation of immovable property, specifically tenancy rights, should be considered for court fee computation, irrespective of whether the suit was filed by the owner or the tenant.
|
